Legal Opinion
Seeber v. Citizens State Bank of Sturgis
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 1967No. Docket 1,711PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*35Fitzgerald, P. J.
The plaintiffs in this ease were nieces and nephews of Harry E. Beadle who died in 1948. Harry E. Beadle had one child, a son, by his first wife. The son, Edwin Beadle, died in 1964 and it is over the provisions of his will that this action was brought. The Citizens State Bank of Sturgis is the duly qualified executor of the will of Edwin Beadle and is the defendant in this action, along with Northwestern University, sole residuary devisee and legatee.
On two separate occasions occurring in 1946 and 1947, Harry E. Beadle purportedly tallied to his son, Edwin Beadle, concerning…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hayes v. SkemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Salsbury v. SackriderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Caswell v. Smith's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Berry v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Mitrage v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- Serkaian v. OzarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Nippa v. Botsford General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Predeteanu v. Freud, Markus, Slavin & MountainMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Nippa v. Botsford General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Seeber v. Citizens State Bank of SturgisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967