State v. Mustapha Bojang
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice SUTTELL, for the Court.
The defendant, Mustapha Bojang, appeals from his conviction of first-degree child molestation. In this appeal, we revisit the defendant’s argument that the statements he made after his arrest and during his interrogation at the Woonsocket Police Department should have been suppressed by the trial justice as the product of illegal coercion by the detectives who interrogated him. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
I
Facts and Procedural History
In State v. Bojang, 83 A.3d 526 (R.I.2014) (Bojang I), this Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. BidoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- State v. MlyniecSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Justice AndradeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
- State v. Hasim MunirSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
- State v. Marc GouinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
- Bojang v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023
- State v. Joseph ColettaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2025