Legal Opinion
Engelmann v. Westergard
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1982No. 12126PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, George Englemann, and his wife filed applications 21051 and 21032 with respondent State Engineer on February 11, 1963. The applications requested water rights sufficient to irrigate agricultural lands in the Penoyer Valley of Lincoln County. The applications were granted.
In September of 1965, Engelmann and his wife filed applications 22756 and 22758, seeking to change the points of diversion of Permits 21051 and 21032. These applications were also granted.
On September 26, 1972, permits 22756 and 22758 were can-celled by the State Engineer pursuant to NRS 533.410, for failure…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Zylstra v. PivaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Craycroft v. FerrallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Craycroft v. FerrallSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gardner v. Pierce County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- State Engineer v. American National Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Great Basin Water Network v. State Eng'rNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. Orr Water Ditch Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- State, Dept. of Taxation v. Scotsman Mfg. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Blaine Equip. Co. v. State, Purchasing Div.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.