Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2007No. 06-3434PublishedCited by 230 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Kathleen Coleman appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The district court concluded the denial of benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) was supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Finding the SSA’s development of the record inadequate, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

In her application for disability benefits, Coleman alleged she was disabled due to a back injury, degenerative disc disease, leg pain,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Theresa Ramirez v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Social Security CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. William B. Johnson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Loyce McCoy v. Richard S. Schweiker, Clifford M. Stack v. Richard S. Schweiker, James D. Desedare v. Richard S. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Baldeo K. Singh v. Kenneth S. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by230 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Brace v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Frederick v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2017
  4. Clevenger v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Bauer v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010

225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API