State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. Taylor-Caldwell
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Douglas, J.:
In this appeal, we confirm that a single test to determine the concentration of alcohol in a person’s breath will require revocation of a driver’s license. We conclude that while NRS 484.386(1) requires that two consecutive samples of breath be taken to provide an evidentiary basis for the concentration of alcohol in a person’s breath, NRS 484.384 does not require that the two consecutive samples be over the legal limit to mandate revocation; only one valid sample must be over the legal limit in order for the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to revoke a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of PharmacyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Garcia v. Scolari's Food & DrugNevada Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by9 opinions
- Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. YeghiazarianNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Cramer v. State, Department of Motor VehiclesNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Public Agency Compensation Trust v. BlakeNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Bombardier Transp. (Holdings) USA, Inc. v. Nev. Labor Comm'rNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- BOMBARDIER TRANSP. (HOLDINGS) USA INC. VS. NEVADA LABOR COMM'RNevada Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.