Legal Opinion
Rademacher v. Colorado Ass'n of Soil Conservation Districts Medical Benefit Plan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1993No. 93-1026PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendants appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to plaintiffs in their suit for damages and payment of certain medical costs under an ERISA benefit plan. The underlying facts of this ease are undisputed.1 Sue Ann Rademacher went into premature labor with twins. The labor was not life-threatening to her, but was life-threatening to the fetuses. Because the local hospital could not provide the neonatal care that would be required for the premature twins, Ms. Rademacher was flown by helicopter to a regional hospital. She delivered the twins, one by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Marguerite HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the GATES RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jenkins v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Yapp v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Rochelle Saks v. Franklin Covey Co. And Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Robert Shawn Treff v. Kerry Galetka, Individually and as the Mailroom Supervisor at the Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.