Legal Opinion

Preer v. Mims

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 23, 1996No. 24492PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

In these consolidated medical malpractice actions, John Preer (“Preer”) and Jacquelyn Preer (“Mrs. Preer”) appeal the trial court’s directed verdict in favor of Dr. Albert Mims. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Preer began seeing Dr. Mims in 1982. Some time later, Preer became acquainted with the prescription drug Vicodin when he took some of the drug his wife was using. The Vicodin relieved his abdominal cramps, so he requested that Mims prescribe the drug for him. In 1986 Mims began prescribing Vicodin for Preer and continued to do so until…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Metzger v. KalkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Brown v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Caughell v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Forshey v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Anderson v. ShortSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Harrison v. BevilacquaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API