Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 2014No. 091131; A145081PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court with instructions that we consider defendant’s two alternative bases for affirmance, which we had not previously reached or resolved. State v. Moore, 247 Or App 39, 269 P3d 72 (2011) (Moore I), rev’d, 354 Or 493, 318 P3d 1133 (2013) (Moore II), adh’d to as modified on recons, 354 Or 835, 322 P3d 486 (2014). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that defendant’s alternative contentions are unavailing. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

We briefly summarize the contextual facts and procedure in this case, taking the following statement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. MacHucaOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API