Legal Opinion
In re Pentland
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 26, 2017No. AC 39161PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
*780The petitioner, Robert V. Pentland III, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.1 On appeal, *781the petitioner claims that the court improperly dismissed his petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of an erroneous conclusion that he was not in the custody of the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, on the challenged conviction when he filed his petition, as *853required by General Statutes § 52-466. We conclude that the petitioner did not allege sufficient facts in his petition to establish the habeas court's…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Garlotte v. FordiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Green v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Holliday v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Dinham v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Gilchrist v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Vitale v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.