Legal Opinion
Bright v. QSP, INC.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided August 28, 1992No. Civ. A. 2:90-0039PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is the motion by QSP, Inc. for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS the motion as to Count One, which asserts a breach of contract claim and DENIES the motion on the remaining issues. The Court further bifurcates Count Seven from the trial of the remaining issues. Count Seven alleges a breach of a July, 1986 contract and the issue raised there is separate, distinct and not germane to other counts in the amended complaint. The Plaintiffs’ remaining causes of action based upon promissory estoppel, misrepresentation, interference with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wheeling Downs Racing Ass'n v. West Virginia Sportservice, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
- Martin v. EwingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
- Quinn v. Beverages of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bright v. QSP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- William T. Bright Ed King Dee Barwick Lowell Lawson Frank Jorgensen Bright of America, Incorporated, a West Virginia Corporation v. Qsp, Incorporated, William T. Bright Ed King Dee Barwick Lowell Lawson Frank Jorgensen Bright of America, Incorporated, a West Virginia Corporation v. Qsp, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994