Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Rowland

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1988No. H003599PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Peter Louis Rowland pleaded no contest to one count of grand theft (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 487, subd. 1). The trial court sentenced him to three years in state prison. The clerk’s minutes and an amended abstract of judgment indicate the trial court also ordered Rowland to pay $611,478 in direct restitution to the victims.

Rowland contends the trial court did not order restitution to the victims and that the notations regarding restitution must consequently be stricken from the amended abstract of judgment.

The People contend full and direct restitution…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re CandelarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. BraesekeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. HartsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. BraesekeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. ZackeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. ZitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API