Charles Edward Moore, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent-Appellant’s motion for stay pending appeal is DENIED. 1
This case is expedited, and a briefing schedule will be issued shortly.
Judge O’SCANNLAIN would grant the motion for stay.
2DissentO’Scannlain, Circuit Judge
I respectfully disagree that we should order the release pending appeal of a double murderer who was sentenced to death by a jury of his peers and whose conviction was affirmed in a lengthy decision by the California Supreme Court.
I have no doubt that Moore’s habeas corpus petition raises substantial constitutional questions, as identified in the district court’s opinion. Nor can I condone the state’s failure…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lewis Donald Fritz v. James SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Bobby R. Savage v. Wayne Estelle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Anthony Paul Maxwell v. G. W. Sumner, Warden, San Quentin PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
4Cited by3 opinions
- Calderon v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Moore v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1738, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3267 Charles Edward Moore, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997