Legal Opinion

Charles Edward Moore, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1995No. 95-99009, 95-99013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Respondent-Appellant’s motion for stay pending appeal is DENIED. 1

This case is expedited, and a briefing schedule will be issued shortly.

Judge O’SCANNLAIN would grant the motion for stay.

2DissentO’Scannlain, Circuit Judge

I respectfully disagree that we should order the release pending appeal of a double murderer who was sentenced to death by a jury of his peers and whose conviction was affirmed in a lengthy decision by the California Supreme Court.

I have no doubt that Moore’s habeas corpus petition raises substantial constitutional questions, as identified in the district court’s opinion. Nor can I condone the state’s failure…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Lewis Donald Fritz v. James SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Bobby R. Savage v. Wayne Estelle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Anthony Paul Maxwell v. G. W. Sumner, Warden, San Quentin PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Calderon v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Moore v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1738, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3267 Charles Edward Moore, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API