Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Drennan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 23, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action of replevin brought by a purchaser from the owner with notice, against an officer for goods attached by him in the way provided for property which cannot be removed immediately. Pub. Sts. c. 161, § 69. The goods were large iron lathes and planers in use in a factory. They weighed from 6,500 to 8,200 pounds, except one, which weighed 1,500 pounds, and the return stated that, by reason of its bulk, the property could not be immediately removed. It is argued that the case Was not within the statute, and that the statute does not permit the property to be left in use by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Cheshire National Bank v. JewettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Davis v. RudolphSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Ayer v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Claremont Gas Light Co. v. WoosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  5. Beaulieu v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API