Legal Opinion
State v. Baca
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1973No. 1048PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
Defendant was tried and convicted by a jury for burglary under § 40A-16-3, N.M. S.A. 1953 (2nd Repl. Vol. 6). Defendant asserts four points in his appeal: (1) that defendant was entitled to the Grand Jury minutes for impeachment purposes in the cross-examination of Rita Sedillo; (2) that the court erred in refusing to give defendant’s Instruction No. 1; (3) that the court erred in granting a continuance and severance of the case; (4) that the court failed to instruct the jury as to criminal intent.
We affirm.(1) The court properly ruled that defendant was not entitled to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. TurnbowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. Superior Court in and for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. SparksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- In re Final Grand Jury Report Concerning the Torrington Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.