Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-06764Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BROUNEY LEWIS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 2:23-cv-6764 TAYLOR-SEIDENBACH, INC., ET AL. SECTION: T (1) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) filed by Third-Party Defendant’s, Bayer CropScience, Inc., as Successor to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, f/k/a BayerProducts, Inc., f/k/a Amchem Products, Inc., f/k/a Benjamin Foster Company (“Bayer”). R. Doc. 94. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, Brouney Lewis and Monica Kelly-Lewis (“Mr. and Mrs. Lewis”), filed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Hibernia National Bank v. Administracion Central Sociedad Anonima, Jorge Raoul Garcia Granados De GarayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Wilton M. EVERSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MBANK DALLAS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Brown v. Drillers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.