Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Wead

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1932No. 27889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

March 13, 1906, C. Will Hamilton, party of the first part, and Fred D. Wead, party of the second part, entered into a contract, the terms of which were as follows:

*855“Memorandum of Agreement
“By and between C. Will Hamilton, hereafter known as party of the first part, and Fred D. Wead, the party hereafter known as party of the second part, witnesseth:
“That whereas, Fred D. Wead has purchased for C. Will .Hamilton the following described property: * * * for the sum of $4,900; and whereas said party of the first-part proposes furnishing the money necessary to purchase said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Goodrich v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Irwin v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Dodd v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mondou v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ray Tucker & Sons, Inc. v. GTE Directories Sales Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Heidlebaugh v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Alexander v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. BextenNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API