State v. Hood
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} At Robert Hood’s (Defendant) trial on charges of trafficking cocaine, the district court excluded, over Defendant’s objection, all members of the public from the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover officer. On appeal, Defendant contends that this courtroom closure violated his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. Applying our Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Turrietta, 2013-NMSC-036, 308 P.3d 964, we conclude that the closure was unconstitutional because although the disclosure of an undercover identity may constitute an overriding interest…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- State v. TurriettaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014