Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1943No. Civ. No. 12536PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tern.

By this proceeding in certiorari

petitioner seeks to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of respondent Tompkins. Tompkins is employed by the city and county of San Francisco as a streetcar conductor on its Municipal Railway. At 12:41 a. m. on February 8, 1943, he finished his “run” for the night at the carbarn of the Municipal Railway at Mariposa and Hampshire Streets in San Francisco. He was allowed ten minutes thereafter to turn in the cash collected by him as conductor, and at 12:51 his wages for the night terminated. Shortly thereafter…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Pacific Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Knorr v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Konopka v. Jackson County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Tallon v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Watson v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Brinkmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Owens v. Southeast Arkansas Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API