Sun Life Assur. Co. v. Maloney
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit upon a life insurance policy was for the death benefits it provided. There were two defenses. The first was; that the insured had agreed “that the policy shall not take effect unless and until the first premium shall have been paid while I am alive and in good health”; that he was not in good health when the first premium was paid; and that the policy, therefore, had never taken effect. The second was that no recovery could be had on the policy because insured in his application for it had given false answers to questions calling for the disclosure of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Geer v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Heller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- McSweeney v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madden v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Karno v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1956
- Rhodes v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Rhodes v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949