Madden v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
When this cause was here before on the appeal of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 1 we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for further and not inconsistent proceedings because the insured had falsely answered question 13, “What clinics, hospitals, physicians, healers or other practitioners * * * have you consulted or been treated by within the past five years?” We held that: “The purpose of [the question] was to reveal medical consultations and treatments of the applicant, so that the insurer might have the benefit of this information as a basis for further…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Geer v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Brown v. CaseSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- American Fire Insurance v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
- Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Lucille L. FugateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- State v. RivensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Rosa Lee Roosth v. Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Canal Insurance Company v. James C. Dougherty, D/B/A East Coast Hatching Egg ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.