Legal Opinion

Laney v. Getty

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided June 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 5:12-306-DCRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.

Previously, the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants concerning Plaintiff E. Scott Laney’s wrongful termination claim under 29 U.S.C. § 2002(3). [Record No. 106] At the same time, the Court gave the parties notice pursuant to Rule 56(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that Laney was likely entitled to summary judgment on the defendants’ alleged violation of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (“EPPA”). [See id.]

The parties have now filed supplemental briefs under Rule 56(f) in accordance with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harrison v. AshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API