Legal Opinion

State v. Owens

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1989No. 87-1854-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether the defendant’s confession to armed robberies was prompted by an alleged coercive promise made by the interrogating officer and therefore involuntarily made.

There is no question that the defendant was offered a promise before he confessed. The state contends he was told that all of the armed robberies to which he confessed would be consolidated into a single proceeding in one county. The defendant does not contend that such a promise would be sufficiently coercive to render his confession involuntary.

The defendant argues that a promise of significantly more…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. WoodsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ClappesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States Ex Rel. Thurmond v. MancusiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  5. Phillips v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. Leng K. XiongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. State v. BrockdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API