Legal Opinion

United States v. Watkins

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 14, 2005No. 04-40012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Hubert Glenn Watkins, Jr., on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Watkins has filed a response requesting the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the brief, Watkins’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FariasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. KrumnowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. FariasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. FariasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. KrumnowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API