Legal Opinion
Bank of Chatsworth v. Hagedorn Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided August 10, 1923No. 3314PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
One of the vital questions in this case is, what is the proper relation of the Bank of Chatsworth to the County of Murray and the public, under the arrangement by which it received and was to pay out the money arising from the sale of the bonds of the county issued for the purpose of the improvement of the public roads and the building of public bridges in that county, and arising from the contribution by the United States government toward the cost of Project 178? It is insisted by the bank that the relation between it and the county is the ordinary one…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- County Commissioners v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- County Commissioners v. People ex rel. MetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
- People v. . Metropolitan Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Bradford v. Justices of Inferior CourtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862
- Knorr v. RaymondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mobley v. Murray CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Dorsey v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Horton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Jones v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.