Legal Opinion

Horton v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1941No. 13576PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pratt, Judge.

It is ably argued by learned counsel for the plaintiff in error that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. When this case was formerly here, 187 Ga. 9, supra, this court in effect ruled that the allegations of the original petition, with the exceptions there stated which have been cured by amendment, taken as true, would entitle the plaintiff in the trial court to the relief sought. After a careful and painstaking study of the record we are unable to hold as a matter of law that the verdict is not supported by evidence. The petition as amended alleges that Mrs.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Garrick v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Detwiler v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Holbert v. AllredCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. West End & Atlanta Street Railroad v. Atlanta Street RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cook v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  3. Nottingham v. WrigleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Dorsey v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API