Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Francis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1978PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.

This is the second of three cases decided today in which we are concerned with G. L. c. 278, § 24, which authorizes the entry of default and imposition of sentence on a defendant, who, having entered an appeal from a conviction in a District Court, fails to appear for trial in the Superior Court. This case, however, presents a somewhat different factual and substantive posture from the first one, viz., that of Commonwealth v. Bartlett, ante 744 (1978).

On May 12, 1976, the defendant, Thomas E. Francis, was found guilty in the District Court of Fitchburg on four complaints charging breaking and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Holmes v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Commonwealth v. DorseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. ColletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. FaulknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Robinson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. GoldoffMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API