Legal Opinion

Stair v. Turtzo, Spry, Sbrocchi, Faul & Labarre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2001No. 42 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

This appeal concerns the entitlement of a law firm to retain attorneys’ fees awarded pursuant to the fee-shifting provisions reposited in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

In 1989, Appellee, Adrienne G. Stair (“Stair”), retained Appellant, the law firm of Turtzo, Spry, Sbrocchi, Faul & Labarre, P.C. (“Turtzo, Spry”), to pursue a claim of gender discrimination against her employer. The parties entered into a fee agreement, which provided, in pertinent part:

The client(s) retain(s) the attorneys and the attorneys agree to represent the client(s) in this matter,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Heldreth v. RahimianWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Olsofsky v. Progressive Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2001
  4. Albertson v. Wyeth Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2003
  5. Loff v. Granville, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API