Legal Opinion

Loff v. Granville

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided April 25, 2001No. 00-CV-6166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEALON, J.,

Defendant, Cary Kasa, has filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the averments by plaintiff, Brad Loff, regarding Kasa’s alleged duty of “extraordinary care,” responsibility to train and supervise defendant, Marie Helen Granville, concerning safe operation of a loaded shotgun, and legal obligation as a landowner. In the alternative, Kasa requests that Loff be required to file a more specific pleading pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1019(a). For the reasons set forth below, the demurrer will be granted as to the assertion of a heightened duty of extraordinary care, but…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A., Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Miketic v. BaronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. Thomas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API