Savage v. K-Mart Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Appellants brought suit against respondent for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of respondent’s negligent maintenance of its store. The jury found respondent was negligent, but that respondent’s negligence was not a direct cause of the injuries. Appellant brought a motion for new trial, alleging that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence concerning respondent’s routine practices and past experiences. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm.
FACTS
On the evening of January 4,1983, appellant Florence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reese v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Vanderweyst v. LangfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Hakala v. Megarry Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morris v. LittlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000