Legal Opinion

Stoopack v. George A. Fuller Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris E. Spector, J.

This proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an inspection of the books and records of the respondent is granted.

Eespondent opposes the application on the ground that petitioner is not proceeding in good faith and on the further ground that the right to the inspection is controlled by the law of the State of New Jersey, the domicile of the respondent, which requires petitioner to establish the purpose and necessity for the inspection.

No facts are submitted by respondent to raise a triable issue as to petitioner’s bad faith in seeking the inspection. The fact that petitioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Solomon v. Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Sheldon v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Rogers v. American Tobacco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rogers v. American Tobacco Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Martin v. Columbia Pictures Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smilkstein v. J. Smilkstein & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gottdenker v. Philadelphia & Reading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API