Legal Opinion

Thom v. Thom

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1951No. 38,410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action to quiet title to real estate. Judgment was for the defendants and the plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff, Carl H. Thom, commenced this action against his brother, Otto Henry Thom, and Ruth, his wife, by the filing of a petition, in the district court of Rarber county, wherein he claimed to be the owner of an eighty acre tract of land located in that county under and by virtue of a warranty deed from his mother, Mary Thom, dated April 25, 1950.

Ruth Thom was made a party to the action and is involved in this appeal solely because…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nolan v. OtneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Durand v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Love v. BlauwSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Bradbury v. WiseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Powers v. ScharlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whipple v. FehsenfeldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Condon National Bank of Coffeyville v. KrigelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Giefer v. SwentonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API