Legal Opinion
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Rodriguez
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*657OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert E. Torres, J.
In this foreclosure action, the defendant Jorge Luis Rodriguez seeks an order, pursuant to CPLR 3408 and Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 202.12, finding that the plaintiff U.S. Bank, N.A. (US Bank), and its loan servicer, Wells Fargo Bank (Wells Fargo), violated their duty to negotiate in good faith during mandatory settlement conferences. Rodriguez maintains that the plaintiff has not provided a timely decision on his loan modification application that comports with the applicable federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Credit Suisse First Boston v. Utrecht-America Finance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Citibank, N.A. v. Van Brunt Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA v. E.M.V Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Van DykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Coan v. ChapinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of America NA v. LucicNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014