Legal Opinion

Bank of America NA v. Lucic

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter H. Moulton, J.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, defendant Milan Lucic (defendant or Lucic), a 68-year-old owner of a two bedroom Manhattan condominium unit, moves for an order tolling interest.1 Defendant was originally pro se, but the Lawyers’ Foreclosure Intervention Network of the City Bar Justice Center agreed to represent him in March 2013. According to the note attached to the complaint, the interest rate is 6.5%, which is relatively high in today’s economy. Although not relevant to this motion, defendant fell into arrears as a result of (1) the downturn of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Dayan v. YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Danielowich v. PBL DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA v. E.M.V Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. HorkanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. PetersNew York Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API