Legal Opinion
Soucek v. Banham
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1993No. C2-92-2466Published
1Opinion of the Court
503 N.W.2d 153 (1993)
Jon SOUCEK, Respondent,
v.
Donald BANHAM, Jr., Dennis Hamilton, and Kim Hedberg, individually and in their capacities as officers of the Minneapolis Police Department, and the City of Minneapolis.
No. C2-92-2466.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
July 13, 1993.
Donald H. Nichols, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Robert J. Alfton, Minneapolis City Atty., Edward A. Backstrom, Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for appellants.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and SHORT and AMUNDSON, JJ.
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants are three police officers of the Minneapolis Police Department,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.