Legal Opinion

Deseret Water, Oil & Irrigation Co. v. State

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1917No. Sac. No. 2081PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mono County. William S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Upon appeal to this court the judgment of the trial court was affirmed for reasons given in the opinion. (167 Cal. 147, [138 Pac. 981].) Under writ of error to the supreme court of the United States (State v. Deseret Water etc. Co., 243 U. S. 415, [61 L. Ed. 821, 37 Sup. Ct. Rep. 394]), that court decided that the construction which this court put upon the federal statute, therein following the decision of the highest federal court which had spoken upon the matter (Hibbard v. Slack, 84 Fed. 571), was erroneous, and that while the state of California had acquired title to the lands…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California v. Deseret Water, Oil & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hibberd v. SlackU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
  3. Desert Water, Oil & Irrigation Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lande v. Southern California Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Viglione v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. CarrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API