Legal Opinion

People v. Sanchez

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 19, 2017No. F071330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanchez was not a party to the civil proceeding in which the injunction was granted. He was not served in or given notice of that litigation, and, furthermore, was a minor at the time of that litigation. Subsequently, on August 17, 2010, when Sanchez was 17 years old, Modesto Police Officer *737Brian Binkley served him with the permanent injunction.5 Binkley testified about serving Sanchez with a copy of the injunction at a suppression hearing in another misdemeanor criminal contempt case, which was pending against Sanchez at the same time as the instant case and was before the same judge.6…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  2. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. VaesauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API