Legal Opinion
Doe v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 7, 2017No. Case No. CV-15-04089-AB (FFMx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CLARIFY AND (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF BENEFITS, FEES, AND COSTS
HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Before the Court is Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America’s (“Prudential”) Motion for Clarification and/or Modification (Dkt. No. 98) and Plaintiff John Doe’s Motion for. Entry of Judgment, Award of Benefits, Prejudgment Interest, Attorneys’ Fees, and Costs of Suit (Dkt. No. 99). Oppositions and replies were filed with respect to both Motions. For the following reasons, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brian W. v. Premera Blue Cross of Washington, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Downes v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Hanrahan v. Statewide Collection, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2021