Legal Opinion

State v. Palacios-Romero

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 2022No. A174421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

563 Submitted April 29, affirmed June 29, petition for review denied November 23, 2022 ( 370 Or 472) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CRUZ PALACIOS-ROMERO, aka Cruz Palacios, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR17197; A174421

514 P3d 137

Defendant was convicted of 41 counts of rape and sexual abuse. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred by (1) denying his request for the “less satisfactory evidence” instruction; (2) discussing jury instructions outside his presence on the morning of the fourth day of trial; (3) instructing the jury that it could return…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. State v. KincheloeOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. DilalloOregon Supreme Court · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. WildeboerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API