Legal Opinion

Missouri v. Nebraska

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1905No. 5, OriginalPublishedCited by 18 opinions

IN EQUITY. ON BILK AND CROSS BILL. This cause coming on for final decree, in pursuance of the opinion of this court filed herein on December 19, 1904, and the stipulation of the respective parties by their counsel filed herein on January 30, 1905, which said stipulation is in words •and figures as follows, to wit:

1Opinion of the Court

"In the opinion of the court in the above-entitled cause, the. order and-finding of the court having been made as follows:
“ ‘It appears from the record that about the year 1898 the county surveyors of Nemaha County, Nebraska, and Atchison County, Missouri, made surveys of the abandoned bed of the Missouri River, ascertained the location of the original banks on either side, and to some extent marked the middle of the old channel. If the two States will agree upon these surveys and locations as correctly marking the original banks of the river and the middle of the old channel, the court will,…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Virginia v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Lovell v. Newman & SonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Duaut A. Duamutef v. John O'keefe, Superintendent, Gouverneur Correctional Facility Thomas Skipper B. HuckebaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Ronson Art Metal Works Inc. v. Gibson Lighter Mfg. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Bolden v. Doe (In re Adoption of J.S.)Utah Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API