Legal Opinion

State v. G.M.V.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 10, 2006No. 24017-7-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.

¶1

Proof of constructive possession requires a showing of dominion and control over the particular place where contraband is found. The question presented here is whether a juvenile who moves out of an upstairs bedroom in her parents’ house and into the basement retains dominion and control over the upstairs bedroom. We do not agree with the juvenile court that G.M.V. had constructive possession of a gun found in the upstairs bedroom. And we reverse her convictions for unlawful possession of an illegally altered (sawed-off) shotgun. We affirm, however, G.M.V.’s conviction for possession of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. S.A.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State Of Washington v. Frankie L. StricklenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Staycey D. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API