Legal Opinion

Keastead v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 1986No. Appeal, 3104 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

This is an appeal by Arthur Keastead (Petitioner) from a denial of his request for Administrative Relief by the Board of Probation and Parole (Board). We affirm.

Petitioner was paroled on November 23, 1983 from a sentence of one and one-half to three years (minimum date of October 4, 1984 and a maximum date of April 4, 1986). On March 18, 1985 while in Petitioners apartment, his parole officer observed nunchakus in the pocket of Petitioners jacket. As a result Petitioner was charged with a violation of parole condition 5(b), which required that Petitioner refrain from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. TinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Bradshaw v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. R. Endrikat v. PA DOC and Sup. M. WahlCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. R.W. Robertson v. DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Thompson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API