Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Arnolt

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 18, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

In this accounting proceeding the petitioners ask for a construction of the last will and testament of the decedent. It is also necessary to dispose of objections to various items set forth in their account. It will be impossible, without extending this opinion to an unreasonable length, to set forth the will in *583full or to discuss in detail the large number of questions which have arisen, and I must content myself with a brief reference to each.

One of the main contentions is that the residuary clause of the will disposes only of personal property, and that the decedent died…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hollis v. . Drew Theological SeminaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Phelps' v. . PondNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Robertson v. . De BrulatourNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. In Re the Accounting of Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Bliven v. . SeymourNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MawhinneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re ReimersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  3. In re the Estate of ByrnesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. Jennings v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Sims v. McMullanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API