Legal Opinion
In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 21, 2006No. MDL NO. 1657PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
438 F.Supp.2d 664 (2006)
In re: VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
This Document Relates To: Barnett
v.
Merck & Co., Inc., 06-485
No. MDL NO. 1657.
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.
July 21, 2006.
ORDER AND REASONS
FALLON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is David Anstice and Merck & Co., Inc.'s ("Merck") Motion to Quash Subpoena (Rec.Doc. 5758). For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Anstice is currently Merck & Co., Inc.'s ("Merck") President of Human Health for Canada, Latin America, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. Prior to serving in his current…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Napier v. BossardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Mason v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- National Property Investors VIII v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hamilton Partners, L.P. v. EnglardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
- Lyman v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA, INC. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Johnson v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
- Operation: Heroes, Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Productions, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.