Ding v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge.. Eouie Ding and another were convicted of conspiracy to violate Act May 6, 1882, § 11, as amended by Act July 5, 1884, by bringing into the United States aliens not lawfully entitled to enter, and they bring error.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge.. Eouie Ding and another were convicted of conspiracy to violate Act May 6, 1882, § 11, as amended by Act July 5, 1884, by bringing into the United States aliens not lawfully entitled to enter, and they bring error. Plaintiffs in error, Eouie Ding and Eouie Lung Gin, together with a number of others, were indicted for conspiring to violate section 11 of the Act of May 6, 1882, as amended by the Act of July 5, 1884, relative to the bringing into the…
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Defendants urge that the lower court erred in its instruction upon the defense of alibi. In examining the charge it is necessary to keep in mind the fact that the indictment alleged that the conspiracy was formed at Seattle on December 10, 1915; that two of the overt acts, taking and delivering a letter, were charged respectively to have been done on that day; that another act, boarding'a launch at Seattle for Vancouver, was charged to have been done on December 11th; that another, embarking on a launch at Vancouver, was alleged to have been done on December 15, 1915; and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Glover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Griggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clyde L. Schaffer and James H. Devenny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. FarinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Bridges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Young v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Reavis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.