Legal Opinion

Moody v. Schloss & Kahn, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 12, 1992No. 2910157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schloss Kahn, Inc., filed a complaint against Al E. Gator's Seafood and Spirit Company, Inc., and Mark Moody, alleging that Al E. Gator's and Moody owed Schloss Kahn $6,828.72, plus interest and attorney's fees under the terms of a written contract. A default judgment, which is not the subject of this appeal, was entered against Al E. Gator's in the amount of $9,651.01; however, Moody denied personal responsibility for the debt. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court denied Moody's motion for summary judgment and entered a judgment in favor of Schloss Kahn in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Government Street Lumber Co. v. AmSouth Bank, NASupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Jones v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. McMullin v. AmSouth BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Williams v. Bank of OxfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Siding Supply, Inc. v. Residential Improvement Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Dozier v. Paterson Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. R.K. Metals, LLC and Mark Lovil v. E & E Co., Inc. d/b/a JLA Home Fabrics, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Robbins Tire & Rubber Credit Union v. HuntCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API