Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1980No. Crim. 3989PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOPPER, J.

In this case we consider several issues with respect to the second degree felony-murder rule (where furnishing of heroin is the underlying felony), the applicability of the accomplice rule, an alleged Miranda violation and asserted error in the exclusion of evidence on suicide. We conclude that reversible error took place by the exclusion of the evidence of declarations on suicide. The other contentions by appellant are without merit.

Statement of the Case and Facts

Appellant (Taylor) was charged with murder of Martin Hendrix, furnishing and giving away heroin on January 27,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. CavittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. StanleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API