Legal Opinion
Reyes v. Anka Research, Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Samuel Greenstein, J.
The motion to dismiss is decided as follows:
Plaintiff Amelia Reyes, together with her husband Jose Reyes, has sued her prior physician for alleged malpractice for insertion in 1973 of a Majzlin Spring Intrauterine Device (hereinafter known as IUD), a birth control device which was recalled at the medical level by the Federal Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.), allegedly prior to the date of insertion. Plaintiff has also joined in this action as party defendants both the developer and the distributor of the Majzlin Spring.
Defendant physician has now…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Thornton v. Roosevelt HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ooft v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Ooft v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Angie v. Johns Manville Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Ogle v. De SanoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hoemke v. New York Blood CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989