Johnson v. Board of Supervisors
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.
The question presented is whether one or both of the plaintiffs are the owners of the homestead in question within the meaning of section 425.11 (2), Code, 1946 (section 6943.152, Code, 1939).
The case comes to us upon a ruling sustaining the Tax Commission’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition. Of course the effect of the motion was to admit the facts pleaded in the petition. We must, therefore, accept such facts as true.
The petition alleges that plaintiffs, husband and wife, have owned and occupied the described - real estate as their borne since May 3, 1926, and received homestead tax…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eysink v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- First National Bank v. MoonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Ahrweiler v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Newman v. De LorimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Adams v. HoldenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Olson v. SievertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Miles Homes, Inc. of Iowa v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Van Buren County Hospital & Clinics v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Kaufman v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.