Legal Opinion

Morris Plan Bank of Fort Worth v. Continental Nat. Bank of Fort Worth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1941No. 14281PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

■ The judgment fi'om which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered in the Tarrant County Court at Law No. One.

The facts in the case are stipulated and all parties are bound by them. Three banks are involved; they are all located in the City of Fort Worth, Texas.

Prior to the matters involved in the suit, Morris Plan Bank was approached by a Mrs. C. W. Doyle, who represented herself to be Mrs. E. B. (Mollie) Holden, and-, advised the bank that her husband, E. B. Holden, desired to borrow $162. She was-furnished with a blank application, to be signed by E. B. Holden. She later…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Sash & Door Co. v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Fort Worth Nat. BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Society National Bank of Cleveland v. Capital National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Southwest Bank v. Information Support Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Strader v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Heusinger Hardware Co. v. Frost National Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API