Legal Opinion

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Fengler

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Nothing in the statute authorizes the Supreme Court to determine in the condemnation proceedings as part of “ the judgment or award ” that reasonable compensation to attorneys is an “expense” of acquisition of land within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 8 of the Syracuse Grade Crossing Act (L. 1928, ch. 825) or to direct payment of such expense out of state moneys. Even assuming that such compensation might in proper case be regarded as “ expense ” within the meaning of the statute, the plaintiff is not entitled to reimbursement from state moneys for such expense except “ on vouchers…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merlino v. Delaware CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. ButlerMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Tomten v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Tomasetti Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API